A concepção de epistemologia da organização do conhecimento

Resumen

Objetivo: Estudo sobre posições epistêmicas que influenciam o domínio da organização do conhecimento a partir da análise da literatura científica. Objetiva descrever a concepção de epistemologia no periódico Knowledge Organization por meio da metateoria. Método: Pesquisa exploratória e descritiva que desenvolve um estudo metateórico baseado na metateoria de Ritzer. Duas ferramentas da teoria fundamentada em dados foram utilizadas, codificação e memorando. Resultado: Três famílias de atributos foram identificadas a partir do processo de codificação e do memorando: o conceito de epistemologia na organização do conhecimento, seu propósito e as posições epistêmicas que influenciam o domínio. A terceira família de atributos é analisada neste artigo. Empirismo, racionalismo, historicismo e pragmatismo são descritos como as principais posições epistêmicas que influenciam o domínio. O pragmatismo predomina na análise, seguido das teorias críticas e do historicismo. Conclusões: O estudo conclui que a concepção da epistemologia no domínio da organização do conhecimento é o estudo crítico dos princípios, hipóteses e produção de conhecimento no domínio. A epistemologia se preocupa com o conhecimento científico produzido pelo domínio da organização do conhecimento, bem como com a aplicação do conhecimento para a criação dos sistemas de organização do conhecimento para apoiar o processo de organização do conhecimento como um todo.

Palabras clave:

Organização do conhecimento, Epistemologia, Posição epistêmica, Metateoria, Teoria Fundamentada em Dados

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Arboit, A. E. (2014). O processo de institucionalização sociocognitiva do domínio de Organização do Conhecimento a partir dos trabalhos científicos dos congressos da ISKO [Tese (doutorado), Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho], Marilia. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/123389

Bies, W. (1996). Thinking with the help of images: On the metaphors of knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 23(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-1996-1-3.

Bufrem, L. S. (2012). A prática da pesquisa e os quadros teóricos concorrentes no campo de produção científica em ciência da informação [Proposta de pesquisa apresentada como requisito parcial à renovação e/ou progressão da Bolsa de Produtividade em Pesquisa do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).].

Bullock, A (Ed.) (1989). Fontana dictionary of modern thought. London: Fontana Press.

Campbell, G. (2000). Queer theory and the creation of contextual subject access tools for gay and lesbian communities. Knowledge organization, 27(3), 122–131. https://doi.org/0.5771/0943-7444-2000-3-122

Castanha, R. C. G. & Gracio, M. C. C. (2014). Bibliometrics contribution to the metatheoretical and domain analysis studies. Knowledge organization, 41(2), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-2-171

Dahlberg, I. (1995). Current trends in knowledge organization. In F. J. García Marco (Org.). Organización del conocimiento em sistemas de información y documentación (pp. 7-25). Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.

Dousa, T. M. (2010). Classical pragmatism and its varieties: on a pluriform metatheoretical perspective for knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 37(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2010-1-65

Flick, U. (2004). Uma introdução à pesquisa qualitativa (S. Netz, Trad.; 2.ed.). New York: Bookman.

Furner, J. (2009). Interrogating “Identity”: A philosophical approach to an enduring issue in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 36(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2009-1-3

Garcia Marco, F. J. & Estebán Navarro, M. A. (1993). On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification. Knowledge organization, 20(3), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-1993-3-126

Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research (4. paperback printing). New York: Aldine.

Gnoli, C. (2008). Ten long-term research questions in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 35(2–3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-137

Gnoli, C. (2012). Metadata about what? Distinguishing between ontic, epistemic, and documental dimensions in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 39(4), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2012-4-268

Guimarães, J. A. C. (2014). Análise de domínio como perspectiva metodológica em organização da informação. Ciência da informação, 43(1), 13–21. Recuperado de http://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/1415/1593

Hansson, J. (2013). The materiality of knowledge organization: Epistemology, metaphors and society. Knowledge organization, 40(6), 384–391. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-6-384

Hjørland, B. (2002a). Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches: traditional as well as innovative. Journal of documentation, 58(4), 422–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410210431136

Hjørland, B. (2002b). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10042

Hjørland, B. (2003). Fundamentals of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 30(2), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2003-2-87

Hjørland, B. (2005). Empiricism, rationalism and positivism in library and information science. Journal of documentation, 61(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510578050

Hjørland, B. (2008). What is knowledge organization (KO)? Knowledge organization, 35(2-3), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-86

Hjørland, B. (2013a). Theories of knowledge organization: theories of knowledge. Knowledge organization, 40(3), 169–181. Library & information science abstracts (LISA). Recuperado de http://search.proquest.com/docview/1692278816?accountid=14784

Hjørland, B. (2013b). Theories of knowledge organization: Theories of knowledge. Knowledge organization, 40(3), 169–181. Library & information science abstracts (LISA). http://search.proquest.com/docview/1692278816?accountid=14784

Hjørland, B. (2014). Is facet analysis based on rationalism? A discussion of Satija (1992), Tennis (2008), Herre (2013), Mazzocchi (2013b), and Dousa & Ibekwe-SanJuan (2014). Knowledge organization, 41(5), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-5-369.

Hjørland, B. (2017). Domain analysis. Knowledge organization, 44(6), 436–464. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2017-6-436

Hjørland, B. (2020). Political versus apolitical epistemologies in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 47(6), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2020-6-461

Hjørland, B. & Hartel, J. (2003). Afterword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains. Knowledge organization, 30(3–4), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2003-3-4-239

Ibekwe-SanJuan, F. & Bowker, G. C. (2017). Implications of big data for knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 44(3), 187–198.

ISKO. International Society for Knowledge Organization. (1989). Charter and preamble. Recuperado de http://www.isko.org/charter.pdf

ISKO. (2007). VII Congreso ISKO, León, España. Recuperado de http://www.iskoiberico.org/congresos/leon-2007/

Kiel, E. (1994). Knowledge organization needs epistemological openness: A reply. Knowledge Organization, 21(3), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-1994-3-148

Kleineberg, M. (2013). The blind men and the elephant: towards an organization of epistemic contexts. Knowledge organization, 40(5), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-5-340

López-Huertas, M. J. (2015). Domain analysis for interdisciplinary knowledge domains. Knowledge organization, 42(8), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-570

Mantzavinos, C. (2016). Hermeneutics. In E. N. Zalta (Org.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/hermeneutics/

Marteleto, R. M. & Carvalho, L. dos S. (2015). Health as a knowledge domain and social field: dialogues with Birger Hjorland and Pierre Bourdieu. Knowledge organization, 42(8), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-581

Martínez-Ávila, D. & Beak, J. (2016). Methods, theoretical frameworks and hope for knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 43(5), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-5-358

Martinez-Avila, D., Semidao, R. & Ferreira, M. (2016). Methodological aspects of critical theories in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 43(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-2-118

Moura, M. A. (2014). Emerging discursive formations, folksonomy and social semantic information spaces (SSIS): The contributions of the theory of integrative levels in the studies carried out by the Classification Research Group (CRG). Knowledge organization, 41(4), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-4-304

Ridi, R. (2016). Phenomena or noumena?: objective and subjective aspects in knowledge organization. Knowledge organization, 43(4), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-4-239

Ritzer, G. (1991a). Reflections on the rise of metatheorizing in sociology. Sociological perspectives, 34(3), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389509

Ritzer, G. (1991b). Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Ritzer, G. (2001). Metatheorizing in Sociology. In G. Ritzer. Explorations in social theory: from metatheorizing to rationalization (pp. 13-33). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Saldanha, G. S. (2014). The philosophy of language and knowledge organization in the 1930s: Pragmatics of Wittgenstein and Ranganathan. Knowledge organization, 41(4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-4-296

Sales, R. de & Murguia, E. I. (2017). Instaurações discursivas da organização do conhecimento: H. E. Bliss e a International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO). Ciência da informação, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf..v44i3.1949

Samuelsson, J. (2010). Knowledge organization for feminism and feminist research: a discourse oriented study of systematic outlines, logical structure, semantics and the process of indexing. Knowledge organization, 37(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2010-1-3

Santis, R. de & Souza, R. F. de. (2014). Classifying popular songs: possibilities and challenges. Knowledge organization, 41(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-2-181

Silveira, N. C. & Saldanha, G. S. (2016). “Own name” in knowledge organization epistemology: A philosophical-theoretical debate. Knowledge organization, 43(4), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-4-265

Smiraglia, R. P. (2013). The epistemological dimension of knowledge organization. IRIS - Revista de informação, memória e tecnologia, 2(1), 2–11. Recuperado de https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/IRIS/article/view/498

Smiraglia, R. P. (2015). Domain analysis of domain analysis for knowledge organization: Observations on an emergent methodological cluster. Knowledge organization, 42(8), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-602.

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. London: Cambridge University Press.

Tennis, J. T. (2005a). Experientialist epistemology and classification theory: Embodied and dimensional classification. Knowledge organization, 32(2), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2005-2-79

Tennis, J. T. (2005b). Conceptions of subject analysis: a metatheoretical investigation. Recuperado de http://search.proquest.com/docview/305423788/

Tennis, J. T. (2008). Epistemology, theory, and methodology in knowledge organization: Toward a classification, metatheory, and research framework. Knowledge organization, 35(2–3), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-2-3-102

Tennis, J. T. (2015). Foundational, first-order, and second-order classification theory. Knowledge organization, 42(4), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-4-244

Vakkari, P. & Kuokkanem, M. (1997). Theory growth in information science: applications of the theory of science to a theory of information seeking. Journal of documentation, 53(5), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007210

Vickery, B. (1998). Metatheory and information science. Journal of documentation, 53(5), 457–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007206

Zins, C. (2004). Knowledge organization: An epistemological perspective. Knowledge organization, 31(1), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2004-1-49
Publicado
2021-04-01
Cómo citar
Araújo, P., Guimarães, J., & Tennis, J. (2021). A concepção de epistemologia da organização do conhecimento. Palabra Clave (La Plata), 10(2), e120. https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e120
Sección
Dossier Epistemología de las ciencias de la información